October 28, 2018
The Most Valuable
Information Free To All

Rising Nuclear Dangers: New Survey Highlights Diverging Views of Strategic Stability between Russia and West

by Robert E. Berls, Jr., PhD, Nuclear Threat Initiative

WASHINGTON, DC—Russia and the West have increasingly divergent interpretations of strategic stability, increasing the risk of nuclear competition, miscalculation and escalation at a time when relations are dangerously frayed, according to a survey of U.S., Russian, and European experts as part of NTI’s Rising Nuclear Dangers series.

The newly released report comes as the United States has announced its intention to withdraw from the Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces (INF) Treaty in response to Russia’s noncompliance. It is now more important than ever that U.S. and Russian officials engage in a dialogue on strategic stability. “Such talks remain a critically important channel for communication to avoid further deterioration of the U.S.-Russian relationship,” according to the report, Rising Nuclear Dangers: Diverging Views of Strategic Stability(pdf).

While, as the report indicates, there is no single definition, strategic stability is generally understood by experts to refer to a state of relations between nuclear powers that, among other things, minimizes incentives for countries to use nuclear weapons or engage in an arms race.

The NTI survey found:

  • Russia’s interpretation of strategic stability remains broader than that of the United States and Europe;
  • Emerging technologies are complicating strategic stability calculations;
  • There is an emerging debate in some corners of Moscow and Washington about whether limited use of nuclear weapons may be viewed by leaders as feasible and less catastrophic, more controllable, and more credible than the threat of massive retaliation; and
  • Left unaddressed, differences in interpretations of what impacts stability and what triggers escalation bear heavily on the risk of miscalculation or accident between Russian and Western forces.

The report, by NTI’s Robert E. Berls, Jr., Ph.D.Leon Ratz and Brian Rose, recommends increased diplomatic, military-to-military, and expert dialogue to address differing perceptions: “Failure of come to a common understanding of strategic stability and to resolve uncertainties about nuclear policies and conflict escalation leaves Russia and the West dangerously at risk of miscalculation with potentially devastating consequences.”

NTI’s Rising Nuclear Dangers series includes:

Rising Nuclear Dangers: Assessing the Risk of Nuclear Use in the Euro-Atlantic Region (pdf)

Rising Nuclear Dangers: Steps to Reduce Risks in the Euro-Atlantic Region (pdf)

Read NTI’s statement on the INF Treaty developments


About the Nuclear Threat Initiative

The Nuclear Threat Initiative works to protect our lives, environment, and quality of life now and for future generations. We work to prevent catastrophic attacks with weapons of mass destruction and disruption (WMDD)—nuclear, biological, radiological, chemical, and cyber. Founded in 2001 by former U.S. Senator Sam Nunn and philanthropist Ted Turner who continue to serve as co-chairs, NTI is guided by a prestigious, international board of directors. Ernest J. Moniz serves as chief executive officer and co-chair; Des Browne is vice chair; and Joan Rohlfing serves as president.

Related Posts

Leave a reply